Broker comparison
Exness vs Pepperstone
Pepperstone holds the higher verdict in our records ("Generally positive" against "Caution"). They have no listed regulator in common. This is a comparison of records, not a recommendation.
Exness
CautionPepperstone
Generally positiveSide by side
- Verdict
- Caution
- Generally positive
- Score
- 60 / 100
- 75 / 100
- Regulators listed
- None listed
- FCA, CySEC
- Number of regulators
- 0
- 2
- FCA register
- Not listed
- Registered
- FCA warning
- None recorded
- None recorded
- Why this score
- no licence verified on a regulator register
- licence verified on register, regulatory record checked
- Last checked
- 4 Nov 2026
- 4 Nov 2026
Regulators compared
Shared
None
Only Exness
None
Only Pepperstone
FCA, CySEC
What each licence means for clients is on the regulator pages, for example the FCA, CySEC pages, or browse all regulators.
Frequently asked questions
Is Exness or Pepperstone better regulated?
Which has the higher verdict, Exness or Pepperstone?
Do Exness and Pepperstone share a regulator?
Compared on record fields only. We hold no spreads, fees or user ratings for these brokers, so this page does not compare them. See how we verify.
We take no affiliate commissions from brokers, prop firms or educators, and rated entities cannot be our affiliates. Verdicts are computed from regulator records and are not for sale.
verify.trading provides records and analysis, not investment advice; trading involves significant risk of loss. Absence of a regulatory action is not an endorsement, and absence from a regulator's list is not proof of authorisation.
Check Exness or Pepperstone in Ask
Ask answers from the verified registry with sources, and covers anything a record does not.