Broker comparison
Pepperstone vs XM
Pepperstone holds the higher verdict in our records ("Generally positive" against "Caution"). They share CySEC as a listed regulator. This is a comparison of records, not a recommendation.
Pepperstone
Generally positiveXM
CautionSide by side
- Verdict
- Generally positive
- Caution
- Score
- 75 / 100
- 66 / 100
- Regulators listed
- FCA, CySEC
- FSA, CySEC, FSCA
- Number of regulators
- 2
- 3
- FCA register
- Registered
- Not listed
- FCA warning
- None recorded
- None recorded
- Why this score
- licence verified on register, regulatory record checked
- regulator warning naming the firm or an entity of its group
- Last checked
- 4 Nov 2026
- 4 Nov 2026
Regulators compared
Shared
CySEC
Only Pepperstone
FCA
Only XM
FSA, FSCA
What each licence means for clients is on the regulator pages, for example the FCA, CySEC, FSA, FSCA pages, or browse all regulators.
Frequently asked questions
Is Pepperstone or XM better regulated?
Which has the higher verdict, Pepperstone or XM?
Do Pepperstone and XM share a regulator?
Compared on record fields only. We hold no spreads, fees or user ratings for these brokers, so this page does not compare them. See how we verify.
We take no affiliate commissions from brokers, prop firms or educators, and rated entities cannot be our affiliates. Verdicts are computed from regulator records and are not for sale.
verify.trading provides records and analysis, not investment advice; trading involves significant risk of loss. Absence of a regulatory action is not an endorsement, and absence from a regulator's list is not proof of authorisation.
Check Pepperstone or XM in Ask
Ask answers from the verified registry with sources, and covers anything a record does not.